http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/ Insights from the World's Most Trivial Man Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:58:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-2386 Mason Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:54:02 +0000 http://tylerstanton.com/?p=2723#comment-2386 Arbitrary for sure. If you're really worried about digestion related issues, the wait should be at least an hour Arbitrary for sure. If you're really worried about digestion related issues, the wait should be at least an hour

]]> http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-2385 Matt_TCoNP Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:06:25 +0000 http://tylerstanton.com/?p=2723#comment-2385 I second that. If it were me, it would be pulling pretty deep from my archive to dredge up Delta Burke. For you, well, only you can say. I second that. If it were me, it would be pulling pretty deep from my archive to dredge up Delta Burke. For you, well, only you can say.

]]> http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-2384 nate Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:45:21 +0000 http://tylerstanton.com/?p=2723#comment-2384 i tell you what, you cannot help but respect a 29 year old guy who can successfully make a Delta Burke reference on his blog. i tell you what, you cannot help but respect a 29 year old guy who can successfully make a Delta Burke reference on his blog.

]]> http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-2383 bryan a Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:41 +0000 http://tylerstanton.com/?p=2723#comment-2383 yeah, i always thought that 30-minute rule was a bit fishy. thanks for clearing this up. yeah, i always thought that 30-minute rule was a bit fishy. thanks for clearing this up.

]]> http://www.tylerstanton.com/2009/12/14/the-origin-of-waiting-30-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-2382 dan Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:21:23 +0000 http://tylerstanton.com/?p=2723#comment-2382 I think you did well being funny in this instance. I think you did well being funny in this instance.

]]>